![]() ![]() However, fantasy tends to try to capture realism in their setting and politics, landscape, etc.Įdit: I owned the game at launch and was not very impressed with visuals, performance was terrible and mouse control was a nightmare. Cyberpunk vs fantasy, they are both very unrealistic, in looks and otherwise. ![]() Luckily I have skyrim running at 65-75fps at all times now though, modded to hell and back too.Īlso, mankind divided doesn't look realistic at all, especially with the orange hue and obviously all the advanced robotics. Witcher 3 feels fantastic at 55-60fps though. ![]() Skyrim remaster at 60fps feels sluggish and unresponsive. I do have Gsync, it works wonders in most games, but not all. TXAA is good enough and you can always force AA through Nvidia control panel if you wish instead of ingame. the fact that my game looks great without MSAA is prefect. (and keep in mind I'm using a huge TV so jaggies are much more obvious.) Also I ran this on my r9 280x and the game ran great around 50-60 FPS dipping to as low as 45fps. Like for me running ultra without MSAA on a 1080p TV and using a 1070 and it looks great. Also you have really high demands for graphics in a video game. Playing in that exact area in golem city gives me around 10-15 more fps then the benchmark stated. Well I find that the benchmark demo is wayyyy more demanding. The game engine really suck whatever setup you choose, and whatever hardware you have it will never look satisfactory. And without it it's too blurry (but no more aliasing). The thing is that with Sharpen on, there is a lot of aliasing. Maybe texture in very high with a bit of tweak. So you could probably run it around high 60fps. It should still be barely playable with a titan x (pascal) on ultra without MSAA. If the increase is as big as what mentionned by Aeratus. When in Praha you will be happy to reach 40fps in the streets whatever is your hardware. Originally posted by Svenos Alk poulpo:But contrary to what most people say, the game does not run better than the benchmark on average appart from inside buildings. DXMD strives for a realistic, gritty look, and to achieve that you need more polygons than in fantasy games like Witcher. Some people say that Witcher looks better. Lots of games these days are built to be maxed out by GPUs 2-3 years down the road. Even on medium or high, this game looks as good as any modern titles out there, and you will get good framerates on these settings. If you want a high fps, you can always lower the settings. All I know is that I've not felt any major issues stepping from indoors to Prague streets. I haven't bothered to check whether Prague streets dips the framerate. I figured after 10 or so patches, the game would be running decent.Īlso DX11 vs DX12 performance would be much appreciated If 60fps is an issue, have you gotten a Gsync monitor? After I got Gsync, I stopped worrying about 60fps, since 55fps looks just as good as 60fps. If the game can't hold 60fps without ever dipping below that, then I'm not buying it. I plan to have msaa, txaa and sharpening off since I use ReShade. Originally posted by BozzCollin:Not looking for answers such as "it's fine" or "it's terrible." I'd like some numbers please. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |